NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boekeman v Aaron [2019] NSWSC 990 Hearing dates: 31 July 2019 Date of orders: 07 August 2019 Decision date: 07 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Summons is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: LAND LAW – easements – substantial interference with rights under easements – where plaintiff and defendant are lot owners in a strata scheme – where right of footway in favour of lot owners exists over part of the defendant's car park space – where right of footway provides access to gas and water meters – where car park space protected by lockable garage door which can be opened by an electronic remote control device – where defendant provided such device to the plaintiff – where plaintiff returned such device – whether lockable garage door is a real substantial interference with plaintiff's entitlement to use right of footway – no substantial interference established Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 88B, 181A, Sch 8 Cases Cited: Buckley v Timbury [2013] NSWSC 1009 Denton v Phillpot (1990) NSW Conv R 55-453 Keefe v Amor [1965] 1 QB 334 Powell v Langdon (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 136 Prospect County Council v Cross (1990) 21 NSWLR 601 Trewin v Felton (2007) 13 BPR 24,579; [2007] NSWSC 851 Zenere v Leate (1980) 1 BPR 97,029 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ross David Boekeman (Plaintiff) Jennifer Eva Aaron (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Lovas (Plaintiff) Mr M Astill (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate