NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lazarus v Kane [2019] NSWCA 194 Hearing dates: 6 August 2019 Decision date: 07 August 2019 Before: Bell P at [1]; Basten JA at [3]; Meagher JA at [31] Decision: (1) Dismiss the amended summons filed on 17 June 2019.
(2) Order that the applicant pay the costs of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – judicial review – offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment – challenge to issue of warrants of commitment – custodial sentence stayed pending judicial review – Court of Appeal order that warrants be amended – further judicial review of "decision" to amend warrants
CIVIL PROCEDURE – judicial review – orders in nature of certiorari – dismissal of proceedings – frivolous or vexatious – amendment of warrants not reviewable – rights affected by final order of court, not by steps taken to implement order
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – judicial review – stay of execution of custodial sentence – whether stay provided in Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69C engaged Legislation Cited: Constitution, Ch III Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Pt 7 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 43 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 178BB, 300 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 69C
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; [1992] HCA 10 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1151; 95 FCR 292; 167 ALR 303 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149; [1996] HCA 44 Lazarus v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 125 Lazarus v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2019] NSWCA 100 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 93 ALJR 252; [2019] HCA 3 Potier v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 359 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sandra Lazarus (Applicant) Michael Kane (First Respondent) Independent Commission Against Corruption (Second Respondent) Director of Public Prosecutions (Third Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: No appearance for applicant Ms J E Davidson/Mr D J Reynolds (Third Respondent) Submitting appearances (First, Second and Fourth Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate