NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fennell [2019] NSWDC 397 Hearing dates: 07 August 2019 Decision date: 07 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Appropriate jury direction where defence assume onus of proof. Catchwords: CRIME — Driving offences — Dangerous driving occasioning death – causation - defence raised on the evidence - onus of proof- no need to boldly go where no one has gone before - go back to 1956 - onus of proof on defence on balance of probabilities - jury directions. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Directions to jury - dangerous driving causing death - where a statutory defence raised. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act (NSW) 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Arulthilakan v The Queen [2003] HCA 74; (2003) 78 ALJR 257 Burns v The Queen [2012] HCA 35; 246 CLR 334 IL v The Queen [2017] HCA 27; (2016) 260 A Crim R 101 R v F (1957) SR (NSW) 543 R v Lavender [2005] HCA 37; 222 CLR 67 R v Simon George Lees (No 2) (Verdict); R v Stuart Lewry (No 2) (Verdict) [2019] NSWDC 118 R v Windle (1958) SR (NSW) 110 Royall v R [1991] HCA 27; 172 CLR 378 Whelan v R [2012] NSWCCA 147 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Amelia Rae Fennell (the accused) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr R Steward (for the accused) Mr D Scully, Deputy Senior Crown Prosecutor (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate