B.J Eldridge & M.E Vincent trading as Crossbones Gallery v Penrith City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1377

Land and Environment Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: B.J Eldridge & M.E Vincent trading as Crossbones Gallery v Penrith City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1377 Hearing dates: 2-3 July 2019 Date of orders: 16 August 2019 Decision date: 16 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The exhibits are returned, with the exception of Exhibits A and 1. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – permissible use with an ancillary use – permissible light industry use with an ancillary tattoo studio – whether modification of the consent would give rise to a prohibited independent use in the B5 zone – whether the proposed development as modified is substantially the same. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 Cases Cited: Gann v Sutherland Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 157 Moto Projects No 2 Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [1999] 106 LGERA 298 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; (1998) 97 LGERA 433 Penrith City Council v Konemann (2017) 225 LGERA 16; [2017] NSWLEC 79 Toner Design Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council (2013) 198 LGERA 203; [2013] NSWCA 410 Trinvass Pty Ltd V The Council of the City of Sydney [2018] NSWLEC 77 Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council, unreported, 24 February 1992 Texts Cited: Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: B.J Eldridge & M.E Vincent trading as Crossbones Gallery (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R O'Gorman-Hughes (Applicant) S Nash (Respondent)