NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perry v Gao [2019] NSWSC 1022 Hearing dates: 24, 25, 27, 28 June 2019 Date of orders: 02 August 2019 Decision date: 02 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rein J Decision: 1. Plaintiff's gift of the Parramatta Property to the Defendant set aside on grounds of undue influence and, alternatively, unconscionable conduct. Plaintiff thereby entitled to a 50% interest in the Parramatta Property (50% being all that he seeks).
2. In the alternative, Plaintiff able to have the s 90UB Financial Agreement set aside for impracticability pursuant to s 90UM, thus allowing an order to be made pursuant to s 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) that he be entitled to a 50% interest in the Parramatta Property.
3. Trustees appointed for sale of the Parramatta Property pursuant to s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW). Catchwords: EQUITY – Trusts and trustees – Constructive and resulting trusts – Family and domestic relationships – Where a de facto husband advanced the full purchase price for a house of which the de facto wife became the sole registered proprietor; whether the de facto wife held the property on trust for the de facto husband – Held: there was no trust, as the de facto husband intended to, and did, make a gift of the property to the de facto wife (although the transaction was set aside on other grounds).
EQUITY – Undue Influence – Unconscionable conduct – Special disability or disadvantage – Where the Plaintiff is a lonely, elderly man and the Defendant is a much younger woman; where parties are in a de facto relationship; where the Plaintiff spoke of committing suicide if the Defendant would not enter into, and remain in, a relationship with him; where the Plaintiff sold his house and, at the Defendant's behest, used the proceeds to buy another house which she became the sole registered proprietor of; where the Plaintiff did not receive independent legal advice about the transaction – Held: transaction set aside on grounds of undue influence and, alternatively, unconscionable conduct. Plaintiff thereby entitled to a 50% interest in the property (50% being all that he seeks).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate