NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Saul v Department of Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATAD 161 Hearing dates: 11 July 2019 Date of orders: 14 August 2019 Decision date: 14 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Ludlow, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Disciplinary decisions – whether fit and proper person to hold a licence Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Property Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: AJO v Director General, Department of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Grenfell v Director General Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 57 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Rosenstrauss v Department of Finance and Services [2012] NSWADT 264 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Stojanovic v Commissioner for Fair Trading, NSW Office of Fair Trading [2008] NSWADT 109 Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749 Tolcher v Gordon [2005] NSWCA 135 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maryellen Saul (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading ( Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Lambert (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate