NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SW v R [2019] NSWCCA 194 Hearing dates: 19 July 2019 Date of orders: 19 August 2019 Decision date: 19 August 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Bell P at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Extend time for leave to appeal to 25 March 2019. (2) Grant leave to appeal. (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME - appeals - appeal against sentence – whether sentence manifestly excessive - applicant pleaded guilty to a number of sexual offences - three further offences taken into account on a Form 1 - offending occurred when the applicant was 15 and 16 years of age - complainant was the applicant's stepbrother aged 10 and 11 years at the time - approximately 16 year delay in prosecuting the offences - whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient weight to the offender's youth and the delay - where the offending was significant - where the offences charged were representative offences - where the offending involved threats and a degree of coercion - consideration of how the offender would have been sentenced but for the delay - sentence not unreasonable or plainly unjust - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61J, 61M, 61L Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 25AA Cases Cited: Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 RL v R [2015] NSWCCA 106 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: SW (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Singh (Applicant) B Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate