NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tarantino (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1055 Hearing dates: 14 and 15 August 2019 Date of orders: 16 August 2019 Decision date: 16 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: The accused, Vinzent Tarantino, is fit to be tried. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – fitness to be tried – Mental Health Forensic Provisions Act 1990 s 8(1) fitness inquiry – whether the accused meets the Presser criteria – whether persecutory delusions and a schizoaffective disorder render the accused unfit to stand trial – accused fit to be tried Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Mental Health Forensic Provisions Act 1990 Cases Cited: Eastman v R (2000) 203 CLR 1; [2000] HCA 29 Kesavarajah v R [1994] HCA 41; (1994) 181 CLR 230 R v Mailes (2001) 53 NSWLR 251 R v Presser [1958] VR 45; (1958) ALR 248 R v Robertson [1968] 3 All ER 557 R v Tarantino [2019] NSWSC 939 R v Tarantino (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 957 R v Tarantino (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 985 R v Taylor (1992) 77 CCC (3d) 551 R v Tier [2001] NSWCCA 53 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Vinzent Tarantino (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P Barrett; V Garrity (Crown) B Rigg SC; P Coady (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Department of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Watsons Solicitors (Accused) File Number(s): 2016/347591 Publication restriction: Not to be published prior to the conclusion of the proceedings at first instance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate