NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Secure Logic Pty Limited v Paul William Noble (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 1057 Hearing dates: 29, 30, 31 July, 1, 2, 5 & 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14 & 19 August 2019, Date of orders: 19 August 2019 Decision date: 20 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Client privilege not waived over the pre-29 March 2016 emails. Catchwords: PRIVILEGE– privileges – client legal privilege – waiver – before the hearing of the proceedings commenced, the plaintiffs waived privilege over a communication with their solicitor dated 29 March 2016 – the principal officer of the plaintiffs was cross-examined on this communication and said he had forwarded some emails to the plaintiffs' solicitor, for the solicitor to advise about the communication of 29 March 2016 – but the plaintiffs' principal officer denied receiving any advice from his solicitor prior to 29 March 2016 – cross-examiner called for any pre-29 March 2016 advice – documents were produced and client legal privilege was claimed over them – whether client legal privilege waived. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 118, 122, 126, 133 Cases Cited: Chen v City Convenience Leasing Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 297 Divall v Mifsud [2005] NSWCA 447 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674; (1976) 11 ALR 577 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Secure Logic Pty Limited v Paul William Noble [2019] NSWSC 991 Singapore Airlines v Sydney Airports Corporation [2004] NSWSC 380 Sovereign Motor Inns Pty Ltd v Bevillesta Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 521 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: First Plaintiff/Cross Defendant: Secure Logic Pty Limited (ACN 154 505 030) Second Plaintiff/ Cross Defendant: Secure Logic Technologies Pty Ltd Third Plaintiff/ Cross Defendant: Secure Logic Pte Ltd Fourth Plaintiff/ Cross Defendant: Plush Hosting Pty Ltd First Defendant/Cross Claimant: Paul William Noble Second Defendant/Cross Claimant: Peach Tree Bay Pty Limited (ACN 132 097 647) Third Defendant/Cross Claimant: John Russell Pankhurst Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: M.R. Elliott SC; S. J. Hallahan First & Second Defendants: B. DeBuse
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate