NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pham v Commissioner of Victim Rights [2019] NSWSC 1060 Hearing dates: 13 August 2019 Decision date: 20 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Leeming JA Decision: Dismiss the amended summons seeking leave to appeal filed on 17 April 2019 with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal from NCAT on question of law – application for victims support under Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW) – applicant claimed he had suffered from an "act of violence" following his arrest by police – whether error of law in rejecting that claim – whether error of law in failing to make findings or give reasons concerning unreasonable use of force when no point had been raised in NCAT – distinction between lawfulness of conduct established by s 230 of Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) and need for applicant to establish commission of offence – significance of applicant's failure following final hearing in District Court of civil proceedings – leave refused Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 79, 83 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 52, 53 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), ss 99, 105, 230 Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW), ss 19, 39 Cases Cited: Kirk v Industrial Relations Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Navazi v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCA 308 Pham v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWDC 73 State of New South Wales v McMaster (2015) 91 NSWLR 666; [2015] NSWCA 228 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Nguyen Son Pham (Plaintiff) Commissioner of Victims Rights (Defendant) Representation: Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate