NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Girgis (née Tanios) v Health Care Complaints Commission [2019] NSWCATOD 126 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 June 2019 Date of orders: 23 August 2019 Decision date: 23 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S McIllhatton, Senior Member M Cross, Senior Member J Zwart, Senior Member Dr C Berglund, General Member Decision: (1) Under s 163B(1)(c) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) a reinstatement order is made.
(2) Under s 163B(4) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) the following conditions are imposed on the applicant's registration for a period of 12 months or, at the expiry of that 12 months, for any such longer period as determined by the Pharmacy Council of NSW (the Council):
(3) Ms Girgis must nominate a registered experienced pharmacist who is unrelated to her to act as her professional mentor for approval by the Council.
(4) The mentoring relationship is to continue for a minimum period of 12 months from the date of the Councils approval or appointment of the mentor, with the Council to determine if an additional period of mentoring is appropriate.
(5) The applicant is to authorise the mentor to report to the Council if there is any concern about her professional conduct or personal well-being.
(6) The applicant is to authorise the mentor to report to the Council about her professional conduct and personal well-being at the conclusion of the 12 month period of the mentor relationship.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate