NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Udovcic v R [2019] NSWCCA 196 Hearing dates: 15 July 2019 Date of orders: 21 August 2019 Decision date: 21 August 2019 Before: Payne JA at [1] Davies J at [2] Hidden AJ at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – assault occasioning actual bodily harm in company – wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – aggregate sentence - whether applicant's representation in the District Court was incompetent – whether discount for late pleas of guilty inadequate - whether sentence excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: De Wet v R [2015] NSWCCA 23 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hili & Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Porter v R [2015] NSWCCA 59 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Hookey [2018] NSWCCA 147 R v Nicholson [2010] NSWCCA 80 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Tsiakas v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luke Udovcic (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Stanton (Applicant) A McGrath (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate