NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Huang [2019] NSWSC 1076 Hearing dates: 14 November 2017, 15 November 2017 Date of orders: 22 August 2019 Decision date: 22 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Johnson J Decision: 1. The Defendant's Notice of Motion filed on 20 April 2016 is dismissed. 2. The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the Notice of Motion. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME – application to exclude property from restraining orders – whether interest is the proceeds of an indictable offence or instrument of any serious offence under s.29(2)(d) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – whether property ceases to be proceeds or an instrument – whether acquisition of property was by a third party for sufficient consideration under s.330(4)(a) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 – application of Lordianto v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (2018) 337 FLR 17; [2018] NSWCA 199 – where Applicant was not a third party – where Applicant did not acquire interest for sufficient consideration – where Applicant was wilfully blind – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002 (Qld) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Criminal Code (Cth) Cases Cited: Brauer v DPP (1989) 91 ALR 491 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Kalimuthu (No 3) (2017) 338 FLR 241; [2017] WASC 108 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Courtenay Investments Ltd (No. 4) [2015] WASC 101 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fernandez (2018) 336 FLR 386; [2018] NSWCA 198 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fernandez [2017] NSWSC 1197 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Gwe and Hoang [2018] NSWSC 992 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Kalimuthu (No. 2) (2018) 340 FLR 1; [2018] WASCA 192 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Lordianto (2017) 324 FLR 237; [2017] NSWSC 1196 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Tjongosutiono (2018) 329 FLR 103; [2018] NSWSC 48 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Vo [2015] NSWSC 1523 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Ronen [2005] NSWSC 990 Henderson v State of Queensland (2014) 255 CLR 1; [2014] HCA 52 Lordianto v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (2018) 337 FLR 17;[2018] NSWCA 199 Lordianto and Anor v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police; Kalimuthu and Anor v Commissioner of the Australia Federal Police [2019] HCATrans 150 and 151 Vu v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] NSWCA 282 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Shana Huang (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr G O'Mahoney (Plaintiff) Mr PJ English (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate