NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ahmad v R [2019] NSWCCA 198 Hearing dates: 2 August 2019 Date of orders: 26 August 2019 Decision date: 26 August 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Wright J at [2]; Wilson J at [3] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal.
2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – appeal against sentence – Commonwealth drug offences – State drug and fraud offences – whether sentence imposed for a discrete offence was outside the available range – utility of sentencing statistics – whether a custodial sentence was warranted for discrete offence – manifest excess – question of parity with co-offender Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 192E, 192G Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11, 307 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 5, 9, 10A, 33 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Dunn v R [2018] NSWCCA 108 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; (1999) 106 A Crim R 149 SS v R [2016] NSWCCA 197 Windle v R [2011] NSWCCA 277 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Youssef Ahmad (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Barrow for Applicant R Ranken for Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate