NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nott v Leung; Chu v Leung [2019] NSWLEC 1394 Hearing dates: 18 June 2019 Date of orders: 16 August 2019 Decision date: 16 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: The Court orders:
Proceedings 2019/55091
(1) The application to remove the tree is refused.
Proceedings 2019/55250
(1) The application to remove the tree is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – two applications concerning one tree – whether there must be a dispute – council refused application to remove a tree – tree owner did not appeal council decision – risk of damage or injury – applicants have not demonstrated that the tree has damaged or is likely to damage property, or is likely to cause injury – arboricultural evidence not consistent with observations Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Texts Cited: New South Wales, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Council, 18 May 2010 (Bob Debus) Parliamentary Counsel's Office (WA), How to read legislation, a beginner's guide (May 2011) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings 2019/55091
Murray Nott (First Applicant) Frances Lorraine Nott (Second Applicant) Kin-Chuen Leung (First Respondent) Wai Ching Leung (nee Ip) (Second Respondent) Hornsby Shire Council (Interested Party)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate