NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Harris for and on behalf of the estate of Harris and Harris v Rapisarda [2019] NSWSC 1088 Hearing dates: 22 August 2019 Decision date: 22 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Strike out application dismissed Catchwords: ESTOPPEL – Anshun estoppel – where proprietors commenced earlier proceedings against builder alleging defective workmanship – where defendant architects prepared the building contract and supervised builder's work but were not joined in earlier proceedings – where earlier proceedings referred out and referee's report adopted – where proprietors do not in these proceedings seek findings inconsistent with those of referee in earlier proceedings – whether unreasonable for proprietors not to have joined architects in the earlier proceedings so that they are now estopped from bringing these proceedings
CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – striking out – abuse of process Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group Plc [2008] 1 WLR 748 Ekes v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 336 Gibbs v Kinna [1999] 2 VR 19; [1998] VSCA 52 Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 231 Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404; [1995] NSWSC 136 Harris v Morabito Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 912 Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; (1843) 67 ER 313 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1; [2001] 2 WLR 72 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 Redowood Pty Ltd v Link Market Services Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 286 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Solak v Registrar of Titles (2011) 33 VR 40; [2011] VSCA 279 Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Collins; Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Tomes (2016) 259 CLR 212; [2016] HCA 44 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 360 ALR 184; [2018] HCA 45 Texts Cited: P W Young, C Croft and M L Smith, On Equity (2009, Thomson Reuters) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Harris for and on behalf of the estate of Arthur Harris and Anne Harris (Plaintiff/Respondent) Horace Rapisarda (First Defendant/Applicant) H&A Building Designers Pty Ltd trading as MLR Architects (Second Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: P J Bambagiotti Plaintiff/Respondent L Shipway (Defendants/Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate