NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Mackenzie (No 2) [2019] NSWCCA 202 Hearing dates: On Written Submissions Date of orders: 28 August 2019 Decision date: 28 August 2019 Before: Preston CJ of LEC, Davies J and Adamson J Decision: The Court orders: (1) The respondents, Grafil Pty Ltd and Mr Mackenzie, are to pay the costs of the appellant, the Environment Protection Authority, of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: COSTS – questions of law submitted under Criminal Appeal Act s 5AE during summary proceedings in Land and Environment Court – successful appellant sought costs of s 5AE proceedings – costs ordered to successful appellant Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Clyne v Wrigley [1980] 1 NSWLR 599 Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Mackenzie [2019] NSWCCA 174 Environment Protection Authority v Riverina (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 252 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Robinson v Woolworths Ltd (2005) 158 A Crim R 546; [2005] NSWCCA 426 Taylor v Environment Protection Authority (2000) 50 NSWLR 48; [2000] NSWLEC 71 Category: Costs Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Appellant) Grafil Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Robert Mackenzie (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Mitchelmore SC, with Mr P English (Appellant) Mr T Howard SC, with Mr C Ireland (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate