NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zhao v R [2019] NSWCCA 203 Hearing dates: 22 July 2019 Date of orders: 26 August 2019 Decision date: 26 August 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Johnson J [14]; Price J [29] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeal against sentence – indecent assault – whether sentencing judge erred in finding the objective seriousness of the offending as in the mid-range – whether sentencing judge erred by not giving sufficient weight to the applicant's remorse – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to properly apply a sufficient discount for the guilty plea – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to consider alternatives to full time imprisonment – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61, 61L Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999 (NSW) ss 5, 21A, 33, 68 Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; (2013) 231 A Crim R 413 Aktar v R [2015] NSWCCA 123; (2015) 251 A Crim R 376 Alvares v R [2011] NSWCCA 33; (2011) 209 A Crim R 297 Anae v R [2018] NSWCCA 73 Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Bray v R [2018] NSWCCA 301 Cummins v R [2019] NSWCCA 163 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Kearsley v R [2017] NSWCCA 28; (2017) 265 A Crim R 233 Lewin v R [2017] NSWCCA 65 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Mun v R [2015] NSWCCA 234 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155 at 241; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Purdie v R [2019] NSWCCA 22 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Daley [2010] NSWCCA 223 R v Hibberd [2009] NSWCCA 20; (2009) 194 A Crim R 1 R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368; [2002] NSWCCA 129 R v Zhao [2018] NSWDC 449 RL v R [2018] NSWCCA 274 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Guanjie Zhao (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Lloyd QC (Applicant) Mr D Patch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate