NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Sydney Hoist and Scaffolding Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 442 Hearing dates: 23 August 2019 Date of orders: 29 August 2019 Decision date: 29 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: In relation to proceedings 2016/57563:
(1) The offender is convicted. (2) The appropriate fine is $300,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty. (3) Order the offender to pay a fine of $225,000. (4) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. (5) Order the offender to pay the prosecutor's costs.
In relation to proceedings 2016/57600:
(1) Summons withdrawn and dismissed. (2) No order as to costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury
SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – appropriate penalty
COSTS - prosecution costs
OTHER – Scaffolding – insufficient ties and bracing to prevent instability and risk of collapse – no documented plan detailing bracing of the scaffold and dismantling of the scaffold – scaffold structure not reviewed by competent engineer – incomplete scaffolding – missing ties – missing bracing – missing handrails Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Fines Act 1996 (NSW) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No. 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Baumer v R [1988] HCA 67; (1988) 166 CLR 51 Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37; (2016) 93 NSWLR 338 BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176 Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 178 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 Unity Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Texts Cited: Australian Standard AS/NZS 1576.1:2010 Scaffolding Part 1: General Requirements Australian Standard AS/NZS 4576.1995 Guidelines for scaffolding Erecting, altering and dismantling scaffold Part 1 Prefabricated steel modular scaffolding Industry Safety Standard - Erecting, altering and dismantling scaffold Part 1 Prefabricated steel modular scaffolding Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor) Sydney Hoist and Scaffolding Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Jordan (Prosecutor) M Johnston SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate