NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust (No 2) v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 126 Hearing dates: 13 August 2019 Date of orders: 03 September 2019 Decision date: 03 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: (1) The appeal is upheld; (2) The decision and orders (2) and (3) of Commissioner Horton of 19 March 2019 are set aside; (3) The proceedings are remitted to a Commissioner or Commissioners (other than Commissioner Horton) to be determined in accordance with these reasons for judgment; (4) The Respondent is to pay the Applicant's costs of the appeal but is to have a certificate pursuant to s 6(1AA) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so qualified; and (5) The matter is listed at 9.00 am on 5 September 2019 before the Registrar for directions. Catchwords: APPEAL - refusal of application for approval of boarding house pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (the SEPP) - issue of whether manager's private open space complied with the SEPP - Commissioner held that the SEPP mandated refusal for non-compliance - ground of appeal that the Commissioner misconstrued the obligation under the SEPP - Council concedes ground made out - ground is made out - Commissioner also refused the proposed development on the basis that it did not demonstrate design excellence as required by cl 7.7(3) of the Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 2015 - two grounds of appeal asserted that Commissioner failed to give reasons for conclusion concerning design excellence - Council concedes grounds made out - grounds are made out - complaint that Commissioner denied the applicant procedural fairness concerning both manager's private open space and design excellence - Council concedes ground made out - ground is made out - application for an exclusionary remitter on the basis the Commissioner would not bring an open mind to the matters of the manager's private open space and design excellence - no basis to complain that the Commissioner could not bring an open mind to the issue of the manager's private open space - reasonable apprehension to conclude that the Commissioner would not bring an open mind to the issue of design excellence - appeal upheld - exclusionary remitter ordered. COSTS - costs ordinarily follow the event in s 56A appeals - Appellant entitled to its costs - application by the Council for a certificate pursuant to s 6(1AA) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 on the basis that the Council did not cause or contribute to the errors forming the basis for the successful appeal - appropriate to order that the Council have a certificate if otherwise entitled Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 38 and 56A Suitors' Fund Act 1951, s 6(1AA) Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 2015, cl 7.7 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, cl 29 Cases Cited: Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Basemount Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 189; (2003) 126 LGERA 339 Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1993) 79 LGERA 367 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Hall v O'Brien [2015] NSWLEC 200 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd and Penrith Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118 Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 110 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd [1987] 10 NSWLR 247 The Presbyterian Church (New South Wales) Property Trust v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 47 Tricon Services Group Pty Limited v Manly Council (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 253 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust (Applicant) Blacktown City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Clay SC/Ms L Nurpuri, barrister (Applicant) Ms A Pearman, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate