NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2019] NSWCCA 209 Hearing dates: 14 August 2019 Date of orders: 18 September 2019 Decision date: 18 September 2019 Before: Brereton JA at [1] Johnson J at [17] Lonergan J at [89] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – primary offence of cultivating not less than commercial quantity of cannabis by enhanced indoor means contrary to s.23(2)(a) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 – two Form 1 offences of cultivation – one Form 1 offence of dealing with proceeds of crime – objective seriousness of primary offence assessed separately before taking into account Form 1 offences – no error demonstrated in assessing objective seriousness – general and specific deterrence important aspects on sentence for cultivation offences – other sentencing decisions assist but do not establish correct range – selection of cases do not include multiple cultivation offences – sentence not unreasonable or plainly unjust – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Abbas v R (2013) 231 A Crim R 413; [2013] NSWCCA 115 Alvares v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 297; [2011] NSWCCA 33 Anderson v Director of Public Prosecutions [1978] AC 964 Andreata v R [2015] NSWCCA 239 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Crowley v R [2017] NSWCCA 99 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Hunter v R [2011] NSWCCA 141 Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Mun v R [2015] NSWCCA 234 Nguyen v R [2008] NSWCCA 322 Nguyen v R [2009] NSWCCA 181 Nguyen v R [2012] NSWCCA 42 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Pham v R [2009] NSWCCA 266 Portolesi v R [2012] NSWCCA 157 R v Georgopoulos [2010] NSWCCA 246 R v Jones [1978] Tas SR 126 RL v R [2018] NSWCCA 274 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Tan v R [2013] NSWCCA 164 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Tran v R [2018] NSWCCA 220 Truong v R [2009] NSWCCA 41 Vu v R [2018] NSWCCA 122 Wei v R [2015] NSWCCA 66 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ha Son Nguyen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms K Stares (Applicant) Mr D Patch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate