NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Souaid v Nahas [2019] NSWSC 1132 Hearing dates: 27 August 2019 Decision date: 03 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Basten J Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal from the judgment and orders of the Local Court.
(2) Order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs in this Court. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – appeal – appeal without leave on question of law – no appeal from findings of fact – availability of appeal with leave on questions of "mixed law and fact"
TORTS – damages – damage to chattel – motor vehicle accident – damaged vehicle unavailable while undergoing repairs – damages for inconvenience – owner's need for replacement vehicle – rental charges incurred for vehicle of equivalent value and prestige to damaged vehicle – whether charges recoverable – whether charges reasonably necessary to meet need Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 39, 40 Cases Cited: Anthanasopoulos v Moseley (2001) 52 NSWLR 262; [2001] NSWCA 266 Beamish v Kanakis [2017] WADC 33; 91 SR (WA) 261 Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 (HL) Droga v Cannon [2015] NSWSC 1910 Nguyen v Cassim [2019] NSWSC 1130 Wong v Maroubra Automotive Refinishers Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 222 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bilal Souaid (Plaintiff) Hanin Nahas (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B W Walker SC / M Kimber SC / W Richey (Plaintiff) S G Habib SC / K Oliver (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate