NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Achurch (No 3) [2019] NSWCATOD 138 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 05 September 2019 Decision date: 05 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Dr J Lucy, Senior Member L Schalk, Senior Member G Tolhurst, Senior Member G Alder, General Member Decision: 1. The Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the issue of costs.
2. The respondent is to pay the 50% of the applicant's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – Principle that costs follow the event – Whether the applicant's making of a complaint in respect of which it did not seek protective orders was disentitling conduct for the purposes of a costs order Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Achurch [2019] NSWCATOD 20 Health Care Complaints Commission v Achurch (No 2) [2019] NSWCATOD 112 Health Care Complaints Commission v Elliott [2018] NSWCATOD 47 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Simone Achurch (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate