NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Curran [2019] NSWDC 460 Hearing dates: 17 May 2019, 6 June 2019 Decision date: 23 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Rafter SC ADCJ Decision: Aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 4 months with a non-parole period of 16 months Catchwords: SENTENCING – extent of retrospective operation of provision – principle of legality – historical offences – where the offender is convicted of seven historical offences – where s 25AA Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) was enacted with retrospective operation – where the provision applies to courts sentencing for historical offences – whether s 25AA cannot operate retrospectively where a proceeding has already commenced prior to the commencement of the section – whether the scope and purpose of the provision reveals a legislative intention for the provision to apply to extant proceedings
SENTENCING – special circumstances – effect of delay – hardship in custody – mitigation of sentence – variation of statutory parole period – where there has been a significant delay between the commission of the offences and the imposition of sentence – where the offender contributed to the delay – whether delay constitutes a special circumstance – where the offender was a judicial officer – where the offender is likely to serve the period of imprisonment in protective custody – whether hardship in custody constitutes a special circumstance Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Legislation Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse) Act 2018 No 33 Cases Cited: AH v R [2015] NSWCCA 51 Baker v The Queen (2004) 223 CLR 513 Barbaro v R (2014) 253 CLR 58 Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Flaherty v R; R v Flaherty [2016] NSWCCA 188 Greenwood v R [2014] NSWCCA 64 Hili v R (2010) 242 CLR 520 Lodhi v R (2006) 65 NSWLR 573 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 372 Mayall v R [2010] NSWCCA 37 Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59 Morgan v R [2017] NSWCCA 269 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 Purtill v R [2016] NSWCCA 80 R v D [1996] 1 Qd R 363 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v EGC [2005] NSWCCA 392 R v JCW (2000) 112 A Crim R 466 R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368 R v Nicholson [2018] NSWDC 347 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Stanton v R [2017] NSWCCA 250 Wade v R [2018] NSWCCA 85 Wong v R (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Graeme Bryan Curran (Offender) Representation: Counsel M Hobart SC (Crown) P Boulten SC and G Lewer (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate