NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Taouk v Assure (NSW) Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 224 Hearing dates: 5 September 2019 Date of orders: 05 September 2019 Decision date: 05 September 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA; Payne JA; Emmett AJA Decision: Summons dismissed as incompetent. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – company in administration – stay of proceedings – s 440D Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal – separate "proceeding" from proceedings at first instance – no written consent by administrator to proceedings in Court of Appeal and leave not granted by Court – proceedings dismissed as incompetent Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 440D, 471B, 500(2) Cases Cited: Distinctive FX 9 Pty Ltd v Statewide Developments Pty Limited [2012] NSWCA 393 Ekes v Hyde Page (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 169 Huang v Hua Cheng International Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 155 Zervas v Burkitt [2019] NSWCA 112 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Joseph Taouk (Appellant) Assure (NSW) Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Hicks SC (Appellant) No appearance for Respondent
Solicitors: Gardner Ekes Lawyers (Appellant) No appearance for Respondent File Number(s): 2019/115207 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity – Expedition List Citation: [2018] NSWSC 1774 Date of Decision: 23 November 2018 Before: Sackar J File Number(s): 2018/198183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate