NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sharma v Inner West Council [2019] NSWLEC 1427 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 August 2019 Date of orders: 10 September 2019 Decision date: 10 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application No. DAREV/2018/11, to rely on the amended plans and documentation referred to in condition 1 of the conditions of consent at Annexure A. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application No. DAREV/2018/11 for alterations and addition to the existing dwelling house, including lower level secondary dwelling, garage and car parking at 172 Evans Street, Rozelle, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gaurav Sharma (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Patterson (Solicitor) (Applicant) S Turner (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/390293 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the imposition of conditions of consent numbered 4(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (k) and (n) on Development Consent D/2017/583, for the land at 172 Evans Street, Rozelle (the site), granted by the Inner West Council (the Council). 2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which has been held on 29 August 2019. I presided over the conciliation conference. 3. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. 4. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision, if the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application. Orders 1. The orders of the Court are: 1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application No. DAREV/2018/11, to rely on the amended plans and documentation referred to in condition 1 of the conditions of consent at Annexure A. 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. Development Application No. DAREV/2018/11 for alterations and addition to the existing dwelling house, including lower level secondary dwelling, garage and car parking at 172 Evans Street, Rozelle, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A. ____________ Susan O'Neill Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (457 KB)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate