NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Invigor Group Limited (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1192 Hearing dates: 14 August 2019 Date of orders: 14 August 2019 Decision date: 14 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Rees J Decision: Extension of time for compliance with demand granted under s 459F(2)(a)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): see [20] Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Where application to set aside statutory demand dismissed — Plaintiff applies for extension of time for compliance with demand pending filing of appeal — Respective prejudice to parties — Not appropriate to require payment into Court — Undertaking to prosecute appeal expeditiously — Two-day extension granted to permit filing of appeal. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459F, 459G Cases Cited: Australian Beverage Distributors Pty Ltd v Cranswick Premium Wines Pty Ltd (2004) 50 ACSR 544; [2004] NSWSC 877 Grandview Ausbuilder Pty Ltd v Budget Demolitions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 341 In the matter of Britten-Norman Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 424 In the matter of Invigor Group Limited [2019] NSWSC 995 JEM Developments Pty Ltd v Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd (2006) 60 ACSR 393; [2006] NSWSC 1378 NA Investment Holdings Pty Ltd v Perpetual Nominees Ltd [2010] NSWSC 373 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Invigor Group Limited (Plaintiff) Raus Capital Fund Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr GD McDonald (Plaintiff) Mr P Afshar (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate