NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Fugace Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 1203 Hearing dates: 9 September 2019 Date of orders: 09 September 2019 Decision date: 09 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Rees J Decision: 1. Order pursuant to section 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that the statutory demand issued by S Cartwright & Sons (Coachbuilders) Ltd dated 3 May 2019 be set aside. 2. Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Statutory demand — Application to set aside — Whether application properly served —"effective informal service" — Where address for service was that of defendant's solicitors — defendant's solicitors thus authorised by the company — Post, DX, facsimile and telephone provided but not email — Plaintiff asked by email whether service by email would be accepted — defendant's solicitors responded that email service not accepted — Plaintiff purported to serve by email at 4.04 pm that day — No response — No evidence of non-receipt — Reasonable inference that city solicitors received email during business hours in 'time critical' matter Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 459E, 459G, 459H Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) reg. 1.0.03; Sch 1, Sch 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 3.7 Cases Cited: Austar Finance Pty Ltd v Campbell (2007) 215 FLR 464; [2007] NSWSC Autumn Solar Installations Pty Ltd v Solar Magic Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 463 David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265; [1995] HCA 43 Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas and Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452; (1996) 21 ACSR 581 Greenmint Pty Ltd v O'Keeffe (2015) 301 FLR 165; [2015] VSC 326 In the matter of Boss Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 543 Sheraz Pty Ltd v Rumsley (2019) 37 ACLC ¶19-018; [2019] FCA 493 Woodgate v Garard Pty Ltd (2010) 78 ACSR 468; [2010] NSWSC 508 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fugace Pty Limited (Plaintiff) S Cartwright & Sons (Coachbuilders) Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S O'Brien (Plaintiff) Mr MA Karam (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate