NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R (Cth) v Cooper [2019] NSWSC 1209 Hearing dates: 30 August 2019 Date of orders: 30 August 2019 Decision date: 11 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: Application refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – dealing with the proceeds of crime – application for a directed verdict with respect to one charge – question of sufficiency of proof – absence of direct evidence – circumstantial case – whether it is open to the jury to infer that cash in accused's possession is the proceeds of crime Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Reference (No 1 of 1983) [1983] 2 VR 410 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 R v LK; R v RK (2010) 241 CLR 177 R v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74; (1989) 44 A Crim R 404 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Jonathan Paul Cooper (Accused) Representation: Counsel: H Barklay QC/S Howell (Crown) D Randle (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown) Anderson Boemi Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2016/00387430 Publication restriction: Judgment previously restricted pending finalisation of all co-accused trials and related appeals. Anonymised and/or redacted to excise any matters the subject of a non-publication order pursuant to s 7 of the Courts Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate