NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Asia Invest Enterprises Pty Ltd v Bircan (No 2) [2019] NSWCATAP 232 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 September 2019 Decision date: 16 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: L Pearson, Principal Member S Frost, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(2) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. (2) The Appellant must pay the Respondents' costs of and incidental to appeal AP 18/53357 on the ordinary basis as agreed or assessed Catchwords: COSTS – Appeal out of time from Consumer and Commercial Division – Extension of time refused – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: Asia Invest Enterprises Pty Ltd v Bircan [2019] NSWCATAP 160 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534 Mendonca v Tonna [2017] NSWCATAP 176 Oshlak v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Owners Corporation SP 79417 v Trajcevski (No.2) [2017] NSWCATAP 173 Thomson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Category: Costs Parties: Asia Invest Enterprises Pty Ltd (Appellant) Zelal Bircan (First Respondent) Silver Chef Rental Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Pearson (Appellant) C Bolger (Second Respondent)
Solicitors: Fortis Law Group (Appellant) Morgan Conley Solicitors Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate