NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cody Franklin [2019] NSWSC 1214 Hearing dates: 13 September 2019 Decision date: 13 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: (1) The accused, Cody Franklin, is unfit to be tried. (2) In accordance with s 14(a) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, Mr Franklin is referred to the Mental Health Review Tribunal. (3) In accordance with s 14(b)(iii) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, I remand the accused in custody until the determination of the Tribunal pursuant to s 16 of the Act or he is released to bail or in accordance with the law. (4) I direct the Registrar of the Supreme Court to provide the following documentation to the Tribunal within 21 days: (a) A copy of my findings and judgment. (b) A copy of the orders which I have made. (c) A copy of the transcript of the proceedings. (d) A copy of the exhibits in the proceedings. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – fitness to stand trial – Presser test – accused charged with murder and intentionally damaging property by fire – where parties agree the accused is unfit to be tried – active symptoms of severe mental illness – schizophrenia – schizoaffective disorder – thought disorder – treatment resistant – bizarre delusions – Christina Aguilera –significantly impaired capacity to participate in proceedings – unable to make a defence or answer to the charge – accused unfit to stand trial Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) ss 10, 14 Cases Cited: Kesavarajah v R (1994) 181 CLR 230; [1994] HCA 41 R v Presser [1958] VR 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Cody Franklin Representation: Counsel: L Shaw (Regina) I Nash (Mr Franklin)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate