NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shanmugathaas & Anor v Paramanirupan & Ors [2019] NSWSC 1219 Hearing dates: 16 August 2019 Date of orders: 19 September 2019 Decision date: 19 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Receivers' remuneration approved in part. Adjustments made to $30,000 limit on receivers' fees. Catchwords: RECEIVERS – Court appointed receivers – remuneration – application for approval by the Court of receivers' remuneration – receivers appointed in July 2018 to undertake specific tasks in relation to a modest property development – the terms of the receivers' appointment included a maximum Court ordered upper limit of $30,000 on the receiver's fees, plus GST plus disbursements – receivers undertake work on the receivership tasks between July 2018 and August 2019 – receivers seek the Court's approval for fees plus GST and disbursements of $197,000 – whether the receivers' fees and disbursements should be approved – whether the cap of $30,000 on receiver's expenses applies – whether the cap can be amended now – whether both parties to the proceedings acquiesced in the receivers undertaking more work than was originally envisaged, when the cap was imposed in July 2018 – what is the appropriate quantum of remuneration that should now be approved for the receivers. Legislation Cited: Partnership Act 1892 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 67 Cases Cited: Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Starpicket Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2013] FCA 699 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 In the matter of Australasian Barristers Chambers Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 799 In the matter of Gondon Five Pty Limited and Cui Family Asset Management Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 469 In the matter of Say Enterprises Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 396 In the matter of Wine National Pty Limited, James Estate Wines Pty Limited and Liquor National Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 4 Mariconte & Anor v Batiste (2000) 48 NSWLR 724 Shanmugathaas v Paramanirupan [2018] NSWSC 1232 Tate v Barry (1928) 28 SR (NSW) 380 Venetian Nominees Pty Ltd v Conlon (1998) 20 WAR 96 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (5th ed, 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate