Wong v Health Administration Corporation [2019] NSWLEC 1442
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wong v Health Administration Corporation [2019] NSWLEC 1442
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 13 June 2019; 28 August 2019
Date of orders: 15 October 2019
Decision date: 15 October 2019
Jurisdiction: Class 3
Before: Parker AC
Decision: The Court Orders:
(1) Compensation is determined in the sum of $2,860,124.00, pursuant to s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act) (Compensation), for the acquisition of the whole of Lot A in Deposited Plan 167106, being the land known as 73 Botany Street, Randwick.
(2) The Applicants are to duly complete, execute and deliver to the Respondent the deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings, with such deed to reflect these terms of agreement and provide for the subject matter of the proceedings being finalised on a full and final basis.
(3) Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the Applicants' duly completed and executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment, the Respondent will pay the Applicants:
(i) the Compensation less any advance compensation paid;
(ii) statutory interest in respect of the Compensation calculated in accordance with the Act; and
(iii) an amount in respect of the Applicant's costs of the proceedings as agreed between the parties during the conciliation process (with no interest payable on this amount).
Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – market value –disturbance – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991
Cases Cited: Adams v Valuer General [2014] NSWLEC 1005
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Juah Mon Wong (First Applicant)
Sai Mon Lim (Second Applicant)
Health Administration Corporation (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
A Perkins (Solicitor) (Applicant)
P Briggs (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Project Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Herbert Smith Freehills (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/339347
Publication restriction: No
Judgment
1. COMMISSIONER: These proceedings comprise an objection to an offer of compensation in the amount of $2,740,124.00 arising from the compulsory acquisition by the Respondent of 73 Botany Street, Randwick, being Lot A in Deposited Plan 167106, from the Applicant under s 66 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (the Act), with the Court required to determine the amount of compensation payable by the Respondent to the Applicant which is within Class 3 of the Court's jurisdiction.
2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 13 June 2019 and 28 August 2019. I presided over the conciliation conference.
3. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Respondent agreeing to pay the Applicant compensation under the Act of $2,860,124.00 arising from the compulsory acquisition.
4. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision if the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 66(2) of the Act to hear and dispose of the Applicant's claim for compensation.
5. I am satisfied that the parties' decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act. The parties adopted a comparable sales approach to valuation in accordance with Adams v Valuer General [2014] NSWLEC 1005 and in a manner that could be adopted by the Court.
6. As the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
7. The Court orders:
1. Compensation is determined in the sum of $2,860,124.00, pursuant to s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act) (Compensation), for the acquisition of the whole of Lot A in Deposited Plan 167106, being the land known as 73 Botany Street, Randwick.
2. The Applicants are to duly complete, execute and deliver to the Respondent the deed of release and indemnity to be issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings, with such deed to reflect these terms of agreement and provide for the subject matter of the proceedings being finalised on a full and final basis.
3. Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the Applicants' duly completed and executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment, the Respondent will pay the Applicants:
1. the Compensation less any advance compensation paid;
2. statutory interest in respect of the Compensation calculated in accordance with the Act; and
3. an amount in respect of the Applicant's costs of the proceedings as agreed between the parties during the conciliation process (with no interest payable on this amount).
………………………..
D Parker
Acting Commissioner of the Court
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 15 October 2019