Hamide v R [2019] NSWCCA 219

Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamide v R [2019] NSWCCA 219 Hearing dates: 19 July 2019 Date of orders: 18 September 2019 Decision date: 18 September 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Bell P at [14]; Davies J at [170] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal against conviction – whether a substantial miscarriage of justice – three discharge applications refused – fourth discharge application not ruled upon – other irregularities - meaning of "irregularities" – cumulative effect of irregularities – whether fair trial compromised by irregularities – curative effect of jury directions – standard of review on a conviction appeal – not House v The King Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 568 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) ss 5, 5G, 6 Cases Cited: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v The Queen (2012) 246 CLR 92; [2012] HCA 14 Barber v R; Zraika v R [2016] NSWCCA 125 Brown v Bowden (1900) 19 NZLR 98 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427; [1996] HCA 22 Curran v R [2017] NSWCCA 123 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517; [1977] HCA 43 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 Kalbasi v Western Australia [2018] HCA 7; 92 ALJR 305 Lane v The Queen [2018] HCA 28; 92 ALJR 689 Maric v The Queen (1978) 20 ALR 513; (1978) 52 ALJR 631 Miller v R [2015] NSWCCA 206; 252 A Crim R 486 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt [2019] NSWCA 102 Mraz v The Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493; [1955] HCA 59 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; 225 ALR 161; 80 ALJR 614 OKS v Western Australia [2019] HCA 10; 364 ALR 573 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 Qing An v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 53 R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; 149 A Crim R 417 R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 R v Bartle [2003] NSWCCA 329; 181 FLR 1 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; 255 ALR 399 R v Grills (1910) 11 CLR 400; [1910] HCA 68 R v Marsland (NSWCCA, 17 July 1991, unreported) R v TS [2004] NSWCCA 38 R v Young & Phipps (NSWCCA, 31 October 1995, unreported) Samadi v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 330; 192 A Crim R 251 Santo v R [2009] NSWCCA 269 Scott v R [2017] NSWCCA 296 The Queen v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592; [1992] HCA 16 Trieu v R [2012] NSWCCA 169 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365; [1988] HCA 6 Wilson v R [2019] NSWCCA 38 Younan v R [2016] NSWCCA 248; 316 FLR 122 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Omar Hamide (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: