NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mitrev [2019] NSWDC 503 Hearing dates: 11 February 2019;12 February 2019 Decision date: 13 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: King SC DCJ Decision: The defence application for a permanent stay of proceedings is refused. The matter is listed for trial on 11/6/19 at 10 a.m. Trial Date confirmed. Trial estimate: 3 weeks Catchwords: CRIMINAL – knowingly make false statement on oath – notice of motion - application for permanent stay of proceedings – test of fairness - onus on the applicant to establish factual basis for the stay, and satisfy the Court that any trial would be an abuse of process – competence of interpreter used in previous court hearings – no audio recordings – defence argument that its inability to raise honest mistake, carelessness, misunderstanding or inadvertence causing possible prejudice to accused rejected. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Williams v Spautz (1991-92) 174 CLR 509 (529); Dupas v R (2010) 241 CLR 237 Jago (1989) HCA 46; 168 CLR 23 R v Davis (1995) 57 FCR 512 R v McCarthy NSWCCA 12 August 1994, R v Reeves (1994) 122 ACTR 1 TSVR [2014] NSWCCA 174 Walton v Gardiner (1993) HCA 77; 177 CLR 378 Webb v R; R v Webb [2012] NSWCCA 216 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Very Reverend Father Mitko Mitrev Representation: Counsel: Mr B Hughes Mr L Katsinas
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate