NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nash v Resource Pacific Pty Ltd (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1253 Hearing dates: 8 September 2018 Date of orders: 20 September 2019 Decision date: 20 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: The defendant shall bring in short minutes of order reflecting this judgment within 7 days of the publication of this judgment. Catchwords: COSTS – application that the prosecutor pay the defendant's costs – prosecution under s 8(2) and s 10(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 – summary proceedings determined by this Court under Pt 5 of Ch 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) – prosecutor failed to prove the defendant committed the charged contraventions of s 8(2) (other than particulars 9 and 11) and s 10(2) – defendant make out statutory defence for particulars 9 and 11 – principles from Latoudis v Casey – whether available for OHS proceedings where dismissed via statutory defence – where prosecution dismissed – significance of dismissal by successful statutory defence – whether principles in Latoudis v Casey distinguishable – charges and conduct of parties in considering exercise of costs discretion – costs to defendant Legislation Cited: Coal Mine Health and Safety Act 2002 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash (2016) 93 NSWLR 338; [2016] NSWCCA 37 Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Ltd (2013) 85 NSWLR 125; [2013] NSWCCA 204 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Nash v Resource Pacific Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 45 Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd; Attorney General for New South Wales v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96 WorkCover Authority (NSW) (Inspector Wolf) v Rockdale Beef Pty Ltd (2006) 155 IR 366; [2006] NSWIRComm 280 Category: Costs Parties: Jennifer Ann Nash (Prosecutor) Resource Pacific Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: JV Agius SC with RJ Rankin (Prosecutor) ML Shume (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate