NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coffey v Murrumbidgee Local Health District formerly known as Greater Murray Area Health Service [2019] NSWSC 1265 Hearing dates: 5-9, 12-15, 20-22, 26, 28 and 29 November 2018. Written submissions in 2019. Date of orders: 27 September 2019 Decision date: 27 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Judgment for the defendant. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – where plaintiff alleges hospital was negligent by failing to transfer her to appropriate hospital for birth of son – where plaintiff alleges hospital failed appropriately to care for son after his birth – where plaintiff sues for nervous shock – whether hospital acted in a manner that was widely accepted by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice – standard of care met by hospital
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – torts – where statement of claim filed 7 years and 2 months after events giving rise to cause of action – whether cause of action was undiscoverable until later date – whether plaintiff under a disability such that limitation period suspended – cause of action not maintainable Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2005 (NSW), ss 43A, 5B, 5O Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 50C, 50D, 50F Cases Cited: Baker-Morrison v State of New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 454; [2009] NSWCA 35 Dobler v Halverson (2007) 70 NSWLR 151; [2007] NSWCA 335 Frizelle v Bauer [2009] NSWCA 239 Guthrie v Spence (2009) 78 NSWLR 225; [2009] NSWCA 369 Kotulski v Attard [1981] 1 NSWLR 115 New South Wales v Harlum [2007] NSWCA 120 South West Sydney Local Health District v Gould (2018) 97 NSWLR 513; [2018] NSWCA 69 Sparks v Hobson (2018) 361 ALR 115; [2018] NSWCA 29 Sydney South West Area Health Service v MD (2009) 260 ALR 702; [2009] NSWCA 343 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Phillip Coffey by his tutor Kathleen Amanda Coffey (Plaintiff) Kathleen Amanda Coffey (Plaintiff) Murrumbidgee Local Health District formerly known as Greater Murray Area Health Service (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Bartley SC with R Ingram and JA Hillier (Plaintiffs) R Cheney SC with J Downing and N Bentley (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate