NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rawson v Studholme (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1273 Hearing dates: 26 September 2019 Date of orders: 03 October 2019 Decision date: 03 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [36] Catchwords: COSTS – 'order contrary' pursuant to Section 88K(5) of Conveyancing Act - discretionary considerations INDEMNITY COSTS – application of UCPR Pt 42 r 42.14 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: cf Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Ltd v International Pools Australia Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 242 Dillon v Gosford City Council [2011] NSWCA 328 G T Corporation Pty Ltd v Amare Safety Pty Ltd (No 3) [2008] VSC 296 Owners Strata Plan 13636 v Ryan [2006] NSWSC 342 Re Frost [2011] NSWSC 591 Shi v ABI-K Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 293 Tempe Recreation Reserve Trust v Sydney Water Corporation [2014] NSWCA 437 Category: Costs Parties: John Warwick Leslie Rawson – first plaintiff Diana Jane Rawson – second plaintiff Edward John Wilson – third plaintiff Patricia Ann Wilson – fourth plaintiff Carmen Richards – fifth plaintiff Tara Marie Robertson – sixth plaintiff Terence Kenneth Little – seventh plaintiff Lesley Little – eighth plaintiff Sydney Reinhardt – ninth plaintiff Elizabeth Patricia Studholme – defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC with Ms M Carpenter – for the plaintiffs Mr N Roucek – for the defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate