NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clark v Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 1277 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 24 September 2019 Decision date: 24 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: The following decision issues:
1. There are no special facts or circumstances prohibiting the exercise of discretion under s 79(3) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW); 2. Pursuant to the provisions of s 79(3) of the aforementioned Act, the Court refuses to consider or otherwise deal with the application further; 3. To the extent otherwise required, the application is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Part 7 of Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – 3 counts of sexual offences and pervert course of justice – one count a directed verdict – 5 acquittals – various appeals already resolved – previous application to Governor dismissed – no special facts or circumstances prohibiting refusing to deal with the matter under s 79(3) of the Act – discretion exercised to refuse to deal with the application further – otherwise application for enquiry dismissed. Legislation Cited: Bail Act 1978 (NSW), s 9D Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 79(1), 79(2) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 78 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 50C Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application of PFC [2016] NSWCA 102 Clark v R [2014] NSWCCA 236 Clark v R [2015] NSWCCA 265 Clark v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 271 Peter Frederick Clark v The Queen [2016] HCASL 79 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318; [2003] HCA 28 House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd & v Workcover Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 172 PFC v State of New South Wales & Anor [2015] NSWSC 1507 PFC v R [2011] NSWCCA 275 PFC v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 241 R v PFC [2011] NSWCCA 117 R v Daron John Wright (Supreme Court (NSW) Rothman J, 7 June 2005, unreported) Ratten v R (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 SKAF, Bilal - Application under Part 7 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2013] NSWSC 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Frederick Clark (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) P Aitken (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate