NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Purves v R [2019] NSWCCA 227 Hearing dates: 13 September 2019 Date of orders: 13 September 2019 Decision date: 13 September 2019 Before: Bell P at [8]; Simpson AJA at [1]; Fullerton J at [10] Decision: (1) Leave granted to appeal against sentence. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Set aside the sentence imposed by the District Court on 2 August 2018. (4) Pursuant to s 12 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) the proceedings be remitted to the District Court. (5) Matter be listed in the District Court at 9.30am on Friday, 20 September 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal against sentence – additional offences taken into account – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA – procedural failure – failure to ask statutory inquiries – procedure to be undertaken by court in which person is convicted – remittal to District Court for sentence Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16BA, 19, 20 Cases Cited: Sabel v R; R v Sabel [2014] NSWCCA 101; (2014) 242 A Crim R 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Douglas Thomas Purves (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) S Callan (Respondent)
Solicitors: Not applicable (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/35364 Publication restriction: Non-publication of any information or material that may lead to the identification of the complainants (Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 578A; Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A) Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 2 August 2018 Before: Williams DCJ File Number(s): 2017/35364
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate