NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dannawi v Dannaway [2019] NSWSC 1287 Hearing dates: 16, & 17 September 2019 Date of orders: 27 September 2019 Decision date: 27 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Plaintiff found to be an "eligible person" under Succession Act 2006, s 57(e). Factors warranting the making of the plaintiffs' application established. Plaintiff left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance, education and advancement in life. Award of a legacy of $80,000 to the plaintiff in substitution for the present provision for him under the will. Plaintiff's costs reserved pending argument about a costs capping order. Defendant's costs paid out of the estate. Catchwords: SUCCESSSION – claim for family provision – deceased dies without spouse or issue – deceased's will gives his estate in varying percentages to his surviving siblings, his nieces and his nephews – the plaintiff, one of the brothers of the deceased, receives 5 per cent of the deceased's estate – the plaintiff claims he is an "eligible person" under Succession Act, s 57(e) on the grounds that he was dependent upon the deceased and lived in the deceased's household – in the event that the plaintiff is found to be an eligible person under s 57(e), whether there are "factors warranting" the making of the plaintiff's application – whether adequate provision was not made for the plaintiff's proper maintenance, education and advancement in life under the deceased's will – what would an appropriate provision be for the plaintiff's proper maintenance, education and advancement in life. Legislation Cited: Charitable Trusts Act 1993 Succession Act 2006, Chapter 3, s 57(e) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2015, rule 7.11 Cases Cited: Drury v Smith [2012] NSWSC 1067 Evans v Levy [2011] NSWCA 125 Re Fulop (deceased); Fulop v Public Trustee; Bide v Public Trustee (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (No. 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Nabil Dannawi Defendant: Don Dannaway Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: D. Reid Defendant: B. Skinner
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate