NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carrington v Wallace [2019] NSWSC 1301 Hearing dates: 2 August 2019 Decision date: 27 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: (1) The Court proposes making the orders as set out in par [115] of these reasons for judgment.
(2) The parties should serve on the other parties and deliver to the Associate to Robb J any comments on the form of the orders that should be made within 14 days of the publication of these reasons for judgment. Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Wills, probate and administration — Proper construction and effect of testamentary dispositions
SUCCESSION — Wills, probate and administration — Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions — Admissibility of extrinsic evidence — Ambiguity at common law — Ambiguity under s 32 of the Succession Act — Ambiguity vs equivocation — No relevant ambiguity found Legislation Cited: Administration of Justice Act 1982, (UK) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Wills Act 1968 (ACT) Wills Act 1997 (Vic) Wills Act 2008 (Tas) Cases Cited: Allgood v Blake (1873) LR 8 Ex 160 Dore v Billinghurst [2006] QCA 494 Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268; [1922] HCA 55 Hobhouse v Macarthur-Onslow [2016] NSWSC 1831 James v Douglas [2016] NSWCA 178 Life Insurance Co of Australia Ltd v Phillips (1925) 36 CLR 60; [1925] HCA 18 Lockrey v Ferris [2011] NSWSC 179 Lubke v Claridge [2016] TASSC 44 Marley v Rawlings [2015] AC 129; [2014] UKSC 2 Re Williams (deceased); Wiles v Madgin [1985] 1 All ER 964 The Estate of William John Gilbert [2017] NSWSC 1138 Texts Cited: GE Dal Pont and KF Mackie, Law of Succession (2nd ed, 2018, LexisNexis Butterworths) National Committee for Uniform Succession Laws Report (December 1997) Sir K Lewison and D Hughes, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (2012, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mischa Grace Carrington (first plaintiff/first cross-defendant) Dean Edward Carrington (second plaintiff/second cross-defendant) Matthew Gary Wallace (first defendant/first cross-claimant) Ashley Joseph Carrington (second defendant/second cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: S Bell (plaintiffs/cross-defendants) J D Cook (defendants/cross-claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate