NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ekila v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2019] NSWCATOD 150 Hearing dates: 11 July 2019 Date of orders: 30 September 2019 Decision date: 30 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – occupational licensing – security licence – revocation – whether applicant fit and proper person – whether contrary to public interest for applicant to hold a security licence Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Road Transport Act 2013 Security Industry Act 1997 Security Industry Regulation 2016 Cases Cited: AJO v Director-General of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Feuerstein v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2007] NSWADT 114 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) (1955) 93 CLR 127 IJ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2003] NSWADT 230 Roberts v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 218 Smith v Commissioner of Police & Commissioner for Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohammad Ekila (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) A Grey, Office of General Counsel, NSW Police Force (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00037585 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate