NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Masters v R [2019] NSWCCA 233 Hearing dates: 6 September 2019 Date of orders: 30 September 2019 Decision date: 30 September 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; Hamill J at [3] Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court, and in lieu thereof: (a) The applicant is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 4 years commencing on 3 October 2017 and expiring on 2 October 2021 with a non-parole period of 2 years expiring on 2 October 2019. (b) The applicant will be eligible for release on parole at the expiration of the non-parole period. (4) Confirm the compensation order made in the District Court. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence - kidnapping and attempted arson – bizarre offending - offender with mental illness - relevance to sentencing - reduction in moral culpability - error in failing to take into account - offences committed during change of drug regime - failure to follow doctor's orders - where no history of violent or bizarre behaviour - correct approach to sentencing - prospects of rehabilitation - failure to make finding - error in sentencing process - applicant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 86(1), 195(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 33, 44 and 53A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; [1990] HCA 18 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Gal v R [2015] NSWCCA 242 Griffiths v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 372; [1989] HCA 39 Jung v R [2017] NSWCCA 24 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lam v R [2015] NSWCCA 143 R v Billy Krey [2019] NSWSC 762 R v Champion (1992) 64 A Crim R 244 R v DW [2012] NSWCCA 66 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Kelsall [2015] NSWSC 480 R v Letteri (Unreported, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 March 1992) Ryan v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 209 WW v R [2012] NSWCCA 165 Zuffo v R [2017] NSWCCA 187 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Russell Lee Masters (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Neild (Applicant) B Hatfield (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate