NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Yelda v Sydney Water Corporation; Yelda v Vitality Works Australia Pty Limited [2019] NSWCATAD 203 Hearing dates: 27 and 28 March 2019 Date of orders: 01 October 2019 Decision date: 01 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Dr R Dubler SC, Senior Member Dr J Goodman-Delahunty, General Member Decision: 1. The Tribunal finds the Respondents have contravened s.22B of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) in respect of the display of the Poster with the image of the Applicant.
2. The Tribunal finds Sydney Water has contravened s25(2)(c) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) in respect of the display of the Poster with the image of the Applicant.
3. The parties are to approach the Registrar to arrange for a date for the matter to be listed for further directions to timetable a hearing on damages in respect of the found contravention of s.22B of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Catchwords: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION – sexual harassment – allegation of conduct constituting sexual harassment by the display of a poster at the workplace – whether employee sexually harassed – whether conduct constituted "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature"
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION – sex discrimination – whether depiction of female employee on a poster amounted to sex discrimination at the workplace – whether the display of the poster amounted to unfavourable treatment on the ground of sex Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aldridge v Booth (1988) 80 ALR 1 Corrective Services v Aldridge (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 5 GLS v PLP (Human Rights) [2013] ECAT 221 Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd [1989] 20 FCR 217 Hooper v Mount Isa Mines Ltd (1997) EOC 93-879 Hunt v Rail Corporation of New South Wales [2007] NSWADT 152 IW v City of Perth (1997) 71 ALJR 943 Johnson v Blackledge [2001] FMCA 6 Poniatowska v Higginbotham [2009] FCA 680 Purvis v New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92 Texts Cited: Oxford Dictionary Category: Principal judgment Parties: Reem Yelda (Applicant) Sydney Water Corporation (Respondent in 2018/213657) Vitality Works Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent in 2018/213589) Representation: Counsel: Ms Kellie Edwards (Respondent in 2018/213589)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate