NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fordham; R v Piukala [2019] NSWDC 534 Hearing dates: 24 June 2019 Date of orders: 26 June 2019 Decision date: 26 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Fordham – imprisonment 6 years 9 months non-parole period 5 years Piukala – imprisonment 6 years 9 months non-parole period 3 years Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Assault occasioning actual bodily harm CRIME — Violent offences — Aggravated robbery SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Principles to be applied SENTENCING — Non-parole period — Standard non-parole period SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment SENTENCING — Probation and parole — Non-parole period SENTENCING — Plea of guilty — Committal for sentence SENTENCING — Commencement — Pre-sentence custody period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Court Act 1998 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Tepania v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 247 Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 White v The Queen [2016] NSWCCA 190 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Jay Mathew Fordham (Offender) John Piukala (Offender) Representation: Emma Fargher (Crown) Scott Schaudin (Offender – Fordham) Ken Averre (Offender – Piukala)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate