NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vok v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 242 Hearing dates: 7 August 2019 Decision date: 04 October 2019 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Payne JA at [36]; White JA at [37]. Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – jurisdictional error – where applicant convicted of knowingly contravening apprehended personal violence order – where applicant appealed against conviction to District Court – whether District Court exceeded jurisdiction in dismissing conviction appeal – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 98 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11, 20 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 14 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Legislation Amendment Act (No 2) 2018 (NSW), s 2, sch 1.21 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: AG v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 218 Armand-Iskak v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 145 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 Bandara v Director of Public Prosecutions [2016] NSWCA 140 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Dranichnickov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Gelle v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCA 245 Lazarus v Independent Commission against Corruption [2019] NSWCA 100 Morgan v District Court of New South Wales (2017) 94 NSWLR 463; [2017] NSWCA 105 Preston v Commissioner for Fair Trading (2011) 80 NSWLR 359; [2011] NSWCA 40 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4; (2018) 92 ALJR 248 Torbey Investments Corporated Pty Ltd v Ferrara [2017] NSWCA 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Vok (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) CO Gleeson (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate