NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Suttle [2019] NSWDC 538 Hearing dates: 14 August 2019, Decision date: 03 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: See [181] – [185] Catchwords: SENTENCING - relevant principles - sexual intercourse child under 16 procuring child for unlawful sexual activity - use of carriage service to transmit indecent article images of penis to a child- use of social media – Snapchat described - use of child to make child abuse material where sexual acts recorded on phone – client of child prostitution where child not a prostitute - sentencing for Commonwealth and State offences- multiple forms 1 - relevant principles set out
SENTENCING - relevant factors- sexual intercourse child under 16 - child prostitution offences- procuring child offences - transmitting indecent article - relevant factors considered – maximum penalties and standard non parole periods considered - multiple victims- course of conduct - Victim Impact Statements considered –offenders prior good character- youth and immaturity - strong support in community-special circumstances - prospects for rehabilitation – multiple victims accumulation – totality – early guilty plea – acceptance of responsibility Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Attorney General's Application No. 1: (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; Clarke-Jeffries v R [2019] NSWCCA 56; Grube v R [2005] NSWCCA 140 Howard v R [2019] NSWCCA 109. Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 MAK v R [2006] NSWCCA 381 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 35 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Milliner v R [2019] NSWCCA 127 Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243 R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 R v Darwich [2018] NSWCCA 46 R v De Leeuw [2015] NSWCCA 183 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56 R v Gommeson [2014] NSWCCA 159 R v King [2009] NSWCCA 117 R v Lee [2010] NSWCCA 88 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368 R v Nelson [2016] NSWCCA 130 R v PFC [2011] NSWCCA 117 R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 R v Schwenke [2004] NSWCCA 289 R v Sea CCA NSW unreported 13 August 1990 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1. RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383. Texts Cited: Does Imprisonment Deter? A Review of the Evidence, Sentencing Advisory Council, Victoria, April 2011 Category: Sentence Parties: Ryan Reginald Suttle (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr Matthew Johnston SC (for the offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate