NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: De Rucci International Pty Ltd v Zhu [2019] NSWSC 1375 Hearing dates: 8, 9 & 10 October 2019 Date of orders: 11 October 2019 Decision date: 11 October 2019 Before: Slattery J Decision: Orders made to continue the existing regime whereby stock is left with the second defendant for sale and proceeds are paid into a nominated bank account. Some allowance is made for first and second defendants to apply the proceeds of sale of the stock. Costs reserved. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Interlocutory applications – plaintiff supplies furniture and bedding to retail stores – plaintiff seeks interlocutory relief for the removal of certain stock from premises leased to the second defendant – defendants resist the relief sought – plaintiff signed Management Agreement with third defendant – third defendant now deregistered –evidence that the plaintiff has accepted second defendant as the active counterparty to the Management Agreement after the deregistration of the third defendant – first defendant controls second defendant – Management Agreement authorises plaintiff to conduct the operation of the third defendant's then the second defendant's business – second defendant terminates Management Agreement – issue as to who owns the stock at the premises leased by the second defendant – is there a serious question to be tried – what is the balance of convenience. Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970, s 66(4) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618 Beese v Woodhouse [1970] 1 WLR 586 Francome v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 892 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 McCarty v Council of the Municipality of North Sydney (1918) 18 SR (NSW) 210 Texts Cited: Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (5th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Lisa King, Direct Solicitors First Defendant: Lucy Zhu (in person) Second Defendant: HQ Living Pty Ltd Third Defendant: Singways (Moore Park) Pty Ltd Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate