NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tate v Duncan-Strelec [2019] NSWSC 1383 Hearing dates: 30 and 31 January 2019 Decision date: 11 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Defendant guilty of four charges of contempt Catchwords: PROCEDURE – Contempt, attachment and sequestration – Contempt – What constitutes – Injunctions to restrain contempt Cases Cited: Amanda Duncan-Strelec & Ors v Thomas Richard Tate & Ors [2010] NSWSC 872 Attorney-General v Butterworth [1963] 1 QB 696 Clarkson v The Mandarin Club Ltd and Others [1998] FCA 1685; (1998) 90 FCR 354 Mahaffy v Mahaffy [2018] NSWCA 42; (2018) 97 NSWLR 119 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1058 R v Dunbabin; Ex parte Williams [1935] HCA 34; (1935) 53 CLR 434 R v Gray [1900] 2 QB 36 Re Colina; Ex parte Torney [1999] HCA 57; (1999) 200 CLR 386 R v Hoser and Kotabi Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 443 Solicitor-General v Radio Avon Ltd [1978] 1 NZLR 225 Tate v Duncan-Strelec [2014] NSWSC 1125 Tate v Duncan-Strelec [2015] NSWSC 190 Witham v Holloway [1995] HCA 3; (1995) 183 CLR 525 Yeshiva Properties No 1 Pty Ltd v Lubavitch Mazal Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 775 Texts Cited: Borrie & Lowe, Law of Contempt (3rd ed 1996) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas Richard Tate (Plaintiff)
Amanda Duncan-Strelec (Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate